VINCENTRIC BEST FLEET VALUE IN AMERICA

 

Once per year Vincentric performs a cost of ownership analysis based upon typical use in commercial fleet to determine the Vincentric Best Fleet Value in America™ Awards. Vincentric measures cost-of-ownership using eight different cost factors: depreciation, fees & taxes, financing, fuel, insurance, maintenance, opportunity cost, and repairs. Each vehicle was evaluated in all 50 states plus DC using 28 different ownership/mileage scenarios. Winners were identified by determining which vehicles had the lowest fleet lifecycle cost in the most scenarios for its segment. A full list of winners is shown below. 

 

 

  • Defining Value – Learn more about how Vincentric defines value for the fleet market. 

 

  • Press Release – Read the full press release announcing the 2023 Vincentric Best Fleet Value in America Awards.

 

 


   2023 AWARD WINNERS

PASSENGER CAR

Subcompact
Kia Rio LX
Contributing factors:
  • Won all 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Repair Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 8 Competitor Trims

Subcompact Hatchback


Kia Rio S
Contributing factors:
  • Won 18 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Repair Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 7 Competitor Trims

Compact


Nissan LEAF S
Contributing factors:
  • Won 16 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Operating Costs in its Class
  • Outperformed 44 Competitor Trims

Compact Hatchback


Toyota Corolla SE
Contributing factors:
  • Won 15 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Outperformed 25 Competitor Trims
Mid-Size
Toyota Camry Hybrid LE
Contributing factors:
  • Won 23 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Outperformed 36 Competitor Trims

LUXURY CAR

Luxury Compact
Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus RWD
Contributing factors:
  • Won 23 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Operating Costs in its Class
  • Outperformed 10 Competitor Trims
Luxury Mid-Size Sedan
Volvo S60 Plug-In Hybrid T8 Core
Contributing factors:
  • Won 27 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Outperformed 58 Competitor Trims

Luxury Large Sedan
Jaguar XF P250 S
Contributing factors:
  • Won 22 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Insurance Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 15 Competitor Trims
Luxury Wagon
Audi A4 Allroad Premium 45 TFSI 2.0T
Contributing factors:
  • Won all 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Insurance Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 6 Competitor Trims

SUV

Subcompact SUV
Chevrolet Bolt EUV LT
Contributing factors:
  • Won 27 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Outperformed 64 Competitor Trims

Compact SUV
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid LE AWD
Contributing factors:
  • Won 8 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Outperformed 171 Competitor Trims
Mid-Size SUV
Subaru Outback Base
Contributing factors:
  • Won 16 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Insurance Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 190 Competitor Trims

Large SUV
Dodge Durango GT RWD
Contributing factors:
  • Won 14 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Outperformed 60 Competitor Trims


LUXURY SUV

Luxury Compact SUV
Tesla Model Y Long Range
Contributing factors:
  • Won all 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Operating Costs in its Class
  • Outperformed 90 Competitor Trims
Luxury Mid-Size SUV
Lincoln Nautilus Base FWD
Contributing factors:
  • Won 22 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Outperformed 62 Competitor Trims


Luxury Large SUV
Audi Q7 Premium 45 TFSI 2.0T
Contributing factors:
  • Won 23 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 33 Competitor Trims

TRUCK

Small Pickup
Ford Maverick Hybrid XL Supercrew FWD
Contributing factors:
  • Won 21 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Operating Costs in its Class
  • Outperformed 55 Competitor Trims
Full-Size 1/2-Ton Pickup
Toyota Tundra SR Double Cab 2WD SWB
Contributing factors:
  • Won 9 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 254 Competitor Trims

Full-Size 3/4-Ton Pickup
Ford F-250 XL Reg Cab 2WD
Contributing factors:
  • Won 16 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Lowest Insurance Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 29 Competitor Trims

Full-Size 1-Ton Pickup
Ford F-350 XL Crew Cab 2WD SWB SRW
Contributing factors:
  • Won 17 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Outperformed 67 Competitor Trims

VAN

Minivan
Toyota Sienna LE
Contributing factors:
  • Won al 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 16 Competitor Trims

Small Commercial Passenger Van
Ford Transit Connect XL LWB
Contributing factors:
  • Won all 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Lowest Repair Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 1 Competitor Trim

Small Commercial Cargo Van
Ford Transit Connect XL LWB
Contributing factors:
  • Won all 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Lowest Repair Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 2 Competitor Trims

Full-Size 1/2-Ton Passenger Van
Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 1500 Std Roof 144 WB
Contributing factors:
  • Won 19 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Operating Costs in its Class
  • Outperformed 8 Competitor Trims

Full-Size 3/4-Ton Passenger Van
Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500 Std Roof 144 WB
Contributing factors:
  • Won all 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Lowest Insurance Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Operating Costs in its Class
  • Outperformed 4 Competitor Trims

Full-Size 1-Ton Passenger Van
Ford T350 Vans XLT Low Roof RWD 148
Contributing factors:
  • Won all 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its CLass
  • Outperformed 8 Competitor Trims

Full-Size 1/2-Ton Cargo Van
Ford T150 Vans Cargo Low Roof RWD 130
Contributing factors:
  • Won all 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Insurance Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 4 Competitor Trims

Full-Size 3/4-Ton Cargo Van
Ford T250 Vans Cargo Medium Roof RWD 130
Contributing factors:
  • Won 20 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Lowest Repair Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 16 Competitor Trims

Full-Size 1-Ton Cargo Van
Ford E-Transit 350 Cargo LR 130 WB
Contributing factors:
  • Won 15 of 28 measured lifecycle cost scenarios
  • Best Fuel Economy in its Class
  • Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
  • Outperformed 14 Competitor Trims

Images shown may not reflect the specific trim level of the winning vehicle.

<Back to Vincentric Best Value in America Awards