|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VINCENTRIC BEST CPO VALUE IN AMERICA AWARDS
|
/Vincentric%20Best%20CPO%20Value%20in%20America_New%20Trophy%20Design_SMALL.png?ver=2024-01-26-123005-983)
Once per year Vincentric performs a cost of ownership analysis at the model level to determine Vincentric Best CPO Value in America™ awards. Vincentric measures cost of ownership using eight different cost factors: depreciation, fees & taxes, financing, fuel, insurance, maintenance, opportunity cost, and repairs. Using a statistical model, winners were identified by measuring which vehicles had lower than expected ownership costs given their market segment and price. Each vehicle was evaluated in all 50 states plus DC using a range of annual mileage intervals and insurance profiles. A full list of winners is shown below.
- Defining Value – Learn more about how Vincentric defines value for the certified pre-owned consumer market.
- Press Release – Read the full press release announcing the 2025 Vincentric Best CPO Value in America Awards.
- Lowest Cost to Own Awards – See the full list of vehicles that earned 2025 Vincentric Lowest CPO Cost to Own in America awards.
|
2025 AWARD WINNERS
|
|
BRAND AWARDS
|
| Passenger Car Brand |
|
Nissan won the Best CPO Value Passenger Car brand award for the second time, aided by wins for the Versa and Z sports car.
|
| Luxury Car Brand |
|
BMW took home the Best CPO Value Luxury Car brand award, helped by wins for the i7 and Z4.
|
| SUV Brand |
|
Nissan earned the Best CPO Value SUV brand award, with wins for the Kicks and Ariya propelling the brand to victory.
|
Luxury SUV Brand
|
|
Returning for the second year in a row, Cadillac won the Best CPO Value Luxury SUV brand award, led by a model-level win for the Lyriq.
|
| Truck Brand |
 |
Ford once again showed the CPO strength of its pickup truck lineup to earn the Best CPO Value Truck brand award for the fifth time. The F-150 Lightning, F-250, and F-350 were all winners this year, along with the Maverick Hybrid.
|
| Van Brand |
 |
For an incredible ninth year in a row, Ford took home the Best CPO Value Van brand award thanks to best-in-class performances by the Transit Connect cargo and passenger vans, and the E-Transit 350. |
|
PASSENGER CAR
|
| Subcompact |
|
Nissan Versa
Contributing factors:
- 1.7% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 3 Competitor Models
|
 |
|
Subcompact Hatchback
|
|
Mitsubishi Mirage
Contributing factors:
- 5.4% below expected ownership costs
- Outperformed 4 Competitor Models
|
 |
|
Compact
|
|
Honda Civic
Contributing factors:
- 3.1% below expected ownership costs
- Outperformed 9 Competitor Models
|
 |
|
Compact Hatchback
|
|
Hyundai Ioniq
Contributing factors:
- 8.7% below expected ownership costs
- Outperformed 13 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Mid-Size |
|
Subaru Legacy
Contributing factors:
- 6.4% below expected ownership costs
- Outperformed 18 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Large Sedan |
|
Toyota Avalon
Contributing factors:
- 2.6% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Lowest Fuel Cost in its Class
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 2 Competitor Models
|
|
| Sports Car |
|
Nissan Z
Contributing factors:
- 10.4% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 8 Competitor Models
|
 |
|
LUXURY CAR
|
| Luxury Compact
|
|
Acura Integra
Contributing factors:
- 14.6% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 12 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Luxury Coupe |
|
Lexus RC Series
Contributing factors:
- 3% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 8 Competitor Models
|
|
| Luxury Mid-Size |
|
Polestar 2
Contributing factors:
- 23.4% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Lowest Depreciation Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 26 Competitor Models
|
|
| Luxury Large Sedan |
|
BMW i7
Contributing factors:
- 15.2% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 15 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Luxury Wagon |
|
Volvo V60
Contributing factors:
- 4.4% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 4 Competitor Models
|
|
| Luxury Sports Car |
 |
Audi e-tron GT
Contributing factors:
- 11.7% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Fuel Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 14 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Luxury Convertible |
|
BMW Z4
Contributing factors:
- 5.4% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 5 Competitor Models
|
|
|
SUV
|
| Subcompact SUV
|
|
Nissan Kicks
Contributing factors:
- 11.2% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 24 Competitor Models
|
|
| Compact SUV |
|
Nissan Ariya
Contributing factors:
- 10.6% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Lowest Repair Costs in its Class
- Outperformed 43 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Mid-Size SUV |
|
Subaru Outback
Contributing factors:
- 9.2% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Outperformed 26 Competitor Models
|
|
| Large SUV |
|
Ford Expedition
Contributing factors:
- 7% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Lowest Fuel Cost in its Class
- Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 7 Competitor Models
|
|
|
LUXURY SUV
|
| Luxury Compact SUV |
|
Volvo C40
Contributing factors:
- 14.7% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 33 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Luxury Mid-Size SUV |
|
Cadillac Lyriq
Contributing factors:
- 16.1% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Lowest Fuel Cost in its Class
- Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 36 Competitor Models
|
|
| Luxury Large SUV |
|
Jeep Wagoneer
Contributing factors:
- 6.1% below expected ownership costs
- Outperformed 9 Competitor Models
|
|
|
TRUCK
|
| Small/Mid-Size Pickup |
|
Ford Maverick Hybrid
Contributing factors:
- 14.4% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Lowest Fuel Cost in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 7 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Full-Size 1/2-Ton Pickup |
|
Ford F-150 Lightning
Contributing factors:
- 12.3% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Fuel Cost in its Class
- Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 6 Competitor Models
|
|
| Full-Size 3/4-Ton Pickup |
|
Ford F-250
Contributing factors:
- 2.8% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 3 Competitor Models
|
|
| Full-Size 1-Ton Pickup |
|
Ford F-350
Contributing factors:
- 1.7% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 3 Competitor Models
|
|
|
VAN
|
| Minivan
|
|
Chrysler Voyager
Contributing factors:
- 3.8% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Outperformed 4 Competitor Models
|
 |
| Small Commercial Passenger Van |
|
Ford Transit Connect
Contributing factors:
- 0.8% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Fuel Cost in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 2 Competitor Models
|
|
| Small Commercial Cargo Van |
|
Ford Transit Connect
Contributing factors:
- 1% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Fuel Cost in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 2 Competitor Models
|
|
| Large Passenger Van |
|
Mercedes-Benz Sprinter
Contributing factors:
- 2.2% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 3 Competitor Models
|
|
| Large Cargo Van |
|
Ford E-Transit 350
Contributing factors:
- 14.8% below expected ownership costs
- Lowest Total Cost of Ownership in its Class
- Lowest Maintenance Cost in its Class
- Lowest Operating Cost in its Class
- Outperformed 4 Competitor Models
|
|
|
<Back to Vincentric Best Value in America Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|